Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Anu Kirk's avatar

The atomization of culture is another way for The Machine to divide and conquer (by setting us against ourselves around relatively insignificant issues) while they further entrench the rules that benefit themselves.

People forget that belonging to a tribe, club, or society can feel really good. But, paraphrasing Peter Gabriel, you can't be inside unless there is an outside where "the others" are.

You may not consider your friends and family who don't share your views "malevolent", but I am pretty sure at least some of them consider those who don't share their views "evil", "demonic", "ANTIFA", and so on. It doesn't matter if someone is "misguided" or "uninformed" if they're trying to kill you as a result of that. The outcome is the same.

For me, the difference is about how you deal with difference. Can you accept it? Or are you compelled to make people conform? Yes, I'm aware of Popper's "paradox of tolerance", and I agree with him, but that already requires more nuance than at least half of the population possesses.

Some people say we live in "bubbles". I think another word for "bubble" is "community" -- and why would I want to be spending time with a bunch of people who keep screaming that I'm wrong and evil, etc.?

One thing about gatekeepers and somewhat restricted communication: to a large degree, it kept the crazies out. Now we put everything -- articles from the NYT, government communications, cat videos, memes from your racist friends, conspiracy theories from crazy relatives, and advertising in the same frames, with the same weights. It's no wonder everyone picks the truth that feels good to them.

Expand full comment

No posts